Wholesale: Products & Services

Archived System CR SCR031102-1 Detail

AT&T would like to see either Confirmed Update (AT) Accepted with Changes (AC) and Fatal (RF) or Accepted with Changes (AC) as the header on each page of the DL FOC reports.

Status History

Project Meetings

-- Ad-Hoc CLEC-Qwest Conference Call - April 9, 2003 SCR020602-1 Directory Listing FOCs via E-Mail SCR031102-1 Header Info on DL FOC Confirmation Reports.

Attendees: Peggy Esquibel-Reed/Qwest, Mark Early/Qwest, Lee Gomez/Qwest, Bonnie Johnson/Eschelon, Shonna Pasionek/Qwest, Jennifer Arnold/USLink, Ian Coleman/Allegiance, Stephanie Prull/McLeodUSA, Christina Menk/USLink, Kathy/Advanced Telecom Group, Chad Warner/WorldCom, Sharon Van Meter/AT&T, Missy Wood/Comcast

SCR020602-1 Discussion: Peggy Esquibel-Reed/Qwest stated that the purpose of the call was to discuss two CR’s submitted by AT&T: SCR020602-1 Directory Listing FOCs via E-Mail and SCR031102-1 Header Info on DL FOC Confirmation Reports. Peggy stated that these CR’s have been discussed in previous CMP Meetings, where it was stated that we needed to wait to implement these CR’s until DirB was deployed and stable. We are now at that point and wanted to meet with you to discuss the requirements and status of these CR’s. Peggy stated that Qwest needs to ask if the email functionality is still requested and if both CRs are needed. Sharon Van Meter/AT&T stated that the email functionality is still needed. Bonnie Johnson/Eschelon also stated that she would also like the email functionality. Bonnie asked if this were all or nothing. Lee Gomez/Qwest stated that yes, once the email functionality was implemented, Qwest would no longer offer the option to fax. Lee stated that this would be similar to autofax where one email would be sent per company and would be based on the User Profiles. Bonnie Johnson/Eschelon asked what would be on the subsequent confirmation/completion report, the name of the report and either initial or follow-up. Sharon Van Meter/AT&T asked if things could be added? Sharon stated that she knows there are limits, like the name of the person it is going back to. Lee Gomez/Qwest asked to confirm that the CLECs would like the initiator name on the subject line. Bonnie Johnson/Eschelon stated that that would be great. Sharon Van Meter/AT&T asked if they could tell Qwest what they wanted, then Qwest can tell us what you can do. Sharon stated wants 1 initiator name (1st initial and last name, not an email address), name of the report, initiator TN. Sharon Van Meter/AT&T asked that if there are 4 people sending in order’s, can’t have name, TN, and all order’s submitted yesterday? Lee Gomez/Qwest stated that will need to be separate ID’s. Missy Wood/Comcast asked if they had a need for a special project, is it ok for a special email box? Lee Gomez/Qwest stated if can do via autofax currently, can do via email. CLEC asked if a column could be added to the report to include all the names. Lee Gomez/Qwest stated that the change to the confirmation/completion report would be a separate CR. CLECs stated that appreciate the great strides for email. Sharon Van Meter/AT&T stated that she is disappointed that more cannot be done and that it took a year to get to this point. Lee Gomez/Qwest asked to confirm that the subject line would contain the name of the report and that would be sufficient for this CR? Sharon Van Meter/AT&T responded yes.

SCR031102-1 Discussion: Lee Gomez/Qwest stated that the name of the report can be carried over on multiple pages. Lee asked if want report name and header information. Sharon Van Meter/AT&T read the CR description and stated that the header to say AT and have information. Lee Gomez/Qwest stated can do with this CR. Sharon Van Meter/AT&T asked if can be sorted with all ACs appearing in one place. Lee Gomez/Qwest stated that the initial report is sorted AT, RF & AC, the subsequent report, follow-up to any AC, is sorted that way. Lee Gomez/Qwest stated that the report would be a Word or PDF document and would have a header on each page. Stephanie Prull/McLeodUSA asked for the products this is being done for. Lee Gomez/Qwest stated is for FBDL only. CLEC asked if this is based on 1 End User Profile and need to change all to have the same email address? Lee Gomez/Qwest stated yes and that internally will have information with valid email address associated to it. Sharon Van Meter/AT&T asked for special projects, can make an exception for a one-time-only thing? Lee Gomez/Qwest stated yes, we would work that out with you. Stephanie Prull/McLeodUSA asked how the CLEC would get the information if email goes down? Lee Gomez/Qwest stated that this is one of the challenges; if there is 1 email address and it goes down, there is no recourse, that is where it is sent. Sharon Van Meter/AT&T stated that AT&T would like to go forward with the email request CR and if they want to further split out, they will issue subsequent CR’s. Sharon Van Meter/AT&T stated that SCR031102-1 can be put in Pending Withdraw and asked for the implementation date for the other CR. Peggy Esquibel-Reed/Qwest stated that it is not yet scheduled and that as soon as we have the targeted implementation date, we would bring it forward via an action item. There were no other questions or concerns. The call was concluded.

May 16, 2002 May Systems CMP Meeting Discussion: Esther Scherer/AT&T stated that her service manager advised AT&T that this request and SCR020602-1 was not funded. Connie Winston/Qwest stated that this CR has not been denied funding but due to the development of DirB, it is very risky to implement any changes to LSS. Qwest is not opposed to doing this work, it just could impact the deployment date. Connie/Qwest stated that will have some discussions with the AT&T service manager, doesn't know where the 'not funded' came from as the CR's are in the funding process. Esther Scherer/AT&T asked if these changes could be made with the implementation of DirB. Connie Winston/Qwest responded that is resistent to that, due to the risk. Has not been rejected and that is why has not brought this up at CMP. Sharon Van Meter/AT&T asked if was hearing that not doing in LSS anot doing in DirB for now? Connie Winston/Qwest responded for now. Sharon Van Meter/AT&T asked if these were a big deal? Connie Winston/Qwest responded no, is purely the risk factor. Sharon Van Meter/AT&T asked what the timeframe was, after the release. Connie Winston/Qwest stated probably Late August or September. Sharon Van Meter/AT&T asked if these requests will get done and won't come back as denied? Connie Winston/Qwest responded that they are still in the queue for the new system.

April 18, 2002 CMP Meeting Discussion: Esther Scherer/AT&T presented CR. Connie Winston/Qwest stated that this CR is currently in definition. Qwest is currently looking into the email portion of this request and whatever is done there will be in the header as well. Michael Buck/Qwest stated that the Level of Effort was in the CR response. The Status remains as Presented.

March 21, 2002 CMP Discussion: Donna Osborne-Miller/AT&T mentioned that this CR might dovetail with SCR020602-1 (Directory Listing FOCs). Donna indicated that this CR seeks to have the header information placed on each page of the CSR. Judy Schultz indicated that if Qwest can do this CR, it may supercede SCR020602-1. Status changed to Presented

March 18, 2002 Clarification Meeting - Donna Osborne-Miller, AT&T Carla Pardee, AT&T Chuck, AT&T Peggy Esquibel-Reed, Qwest J. J. Bradley, Qwest Mark Early, Qwest Kathy Hill, Qwest Gerald Mohatt, Qwest

Reviewed CR Description: This CR seeks to include header information on the DL FOC Confirmation/Completion Reports on each page of report. AT&T would like to see either Confirmed Update (AT) Accepted with Changes (AC) and Fatal (RF) or Accepted with Changes (AC) as the header on each page of the DL FOC reports. Donna stated that this effort would help out their Center’s. AT&T is requesting that the header information that appears on the first page, be included on all subsequent pages of both reports. The sort is to remain as it is today: AT, AC, and RF. AT&T Center’s use IMA GUI but other’s do use IMA EDI.

CenturyLink Response