Wholesale: Products & Services

Archived System CR SCR040306-01 Detail

Add new product specific reject codes to IMA and Fax Gateway. This eliminates the need for a Remark explanation and allows for immediate recognition by code of the reject reason. New reject condition needs to be supported are:

- "Cannot issue conversion order. Request pending for LNP or LSNP"

- "DSL cable is not valid for Unbundled Distribution Loop - Subloop. Resubmit with qualified CABCONN data."

- "Service/feature requested is not available in this wire center"

- "No FOC received from current provider. Cannot process Port In request"

- "CFA, NC, NCI, or SEC NCI do not match the CSR on UBL requests with ACT=T or M"

- "Rejected by current provider. Cannot process Port In request"

----------------------------------------------

Original Description:

Add new product specific reject codes to IMA and Fax Gateway. This eliminates the need for a Remark explanation and allows for immediate recognition by code of the reject reason. New reject condition needs to be supported are:

- "Cannot issue conversion order. Request pending for LNP or LSNP"

- "DSL cable is not valid for Unbundled Distribution Loop - Subloop. Resubmit with qualified CABCONN data."

- "Service/feature requested is not available in this wire center"

- "Cannot process Port In request until FOC provided from current provider"

- "CFA, NC, NCI, or SEC NCI do not match the CSR on UBL requests with ACT=T or M"

Status History

Project Meetings

-- May 16, 2007 Systems CMP Meeting Discussion: Mark Coyne-Qwest stated that these are all IMA 21.0 CRs and stated that the Release will be on May 21st. Mark then stated that Qwest will ask for closure of these CRs in the June CMP Meeting.

March 21, 2007 Combined Overview and IMA XML Disclosure Documentation Walkthrough for IMA XML Release 21.0 Attendees List: Anders Ingemarson-Qwest, Art Elser-Qwest, Carol McKenzie-Qwest, Chuck Anderson-Qwest, Cimberlie Chambers-Qwest, Dawn Beck-Qwest, Denise Martinez-Qwest, Gary Berroa-Qwest, Jeff Sonnier-Sprint, Jo Lloyd-Qwest, Joyce Bilow-McLeodUSA, Joyce Hui-Qwest, Judy DeRosier-Qwest, Kim Isaacs-Eschelon, Lee Gomez-Qwest, Lynn Stecklein-Qwest, Matt Osielski-Qwest, Peggy Esquibel Reed-Qwest (List may be incomplete)

Carol McKenzie began the meeting by taking attendance and announcing the purpose of the meeting. Carol explained that the walkthrough would cover the candidates, candidate impacts to the associated documentation, and the IMA XML Disclosure Document. The Meeting Agenda, Candidate Overview document, and a Summary of documentation changes customers can expect to see in the final version of the tech specs that do not appear in the draft are attached to the Wholesale Calendar entry for the IMA XML 21.0 CLEC Walk-through, which is located at http://www.qwest.com/wholesale/calendar under today’s date.

Candidate Review: Denise Martinez Functional Overview: New product specific reject codes are being added to the IMA and Fax Gateway systems. These reject values eliminate the need for Remark explanations and allow for immediate recognition by code of the reject reason. The new reject codes and descriptions that are being introduced with this release are: 614 = Service/feature requested is not available in this wire center. 732 = No FOC received from current provider. Cannot process Port In request. 733 = Rejected by current provider. Cannot process Port In request. 770 = DSL cable is not valid for Unbundled Distribution Loop - Subloop. Resubmit with qualified CABCONN data. 771 = CFA, NC, NCI, or SEC NCI do not match the CSR on UBL requests with ACT=T or M. 832 = Cannot issue conversion order. Request pending for LNP or LSNP. MULTI-RELEASE INFORMATION: This candidate is not multi-release. Form Impacts: LR form and Manual LR form Products: All but FBDL Activities: All activities IT Analyst: Chuck Anderson Business Rep.: Denise Martinez

Denise Martinez reviewed the information provided in the candidate overview document. Denise further explained that the new reject codes 614 and 732 are specific to port requests and reject codes 770 and 771 are associated with UNE products. Denise opened the floor to Questions. No comments or questions were asked. Carol moved discussion to the next candidate.

-- February 21, 2007 Systems CMP Meeting Discussion: Mark Coyne-Qwest stated that this attachment contained the 5 candidates that are committed to the IMA & SATE 21.0 Release. Mark asked if there were any questions. There were none.

December 14, 2006 Monthly Systems CMP Meeting Discussion: Mark Coyne-Qwest stated that this attachment includes the Revised 21.0 Prioritization List, as a result of the Late Adder, and also includes Packaging for 21.0. Mark then asked if there were any questions. Jeff Sonnier-Sprint Nextel asked how many, on the revised 21.0 list, were being implemented. Mark Coyne-Qwest stated that the top 5 would be implemented and that the 21.0 Packaging was included in this attachment.

August 16, 2006 Monthly Systems CMP Meeting Discussion: Peggy Esquibel Reed-Qwest stated that the list of IMA 21.0 candidates, along with the Prioritization Instructions, is located in Attachment M of the distribution Package. Peggy noted that there are 19 candidates, eligible for prioritization. And for this CR Review Exercise, as in the past, Qwest and each CLEC will indicate what their top 2 candidates are. Peggy stated that we would then follow with the review of the prioritization instructions. Peggy asked if there were any questions. There were none brought forward. Peggy then asked for the top 2 candidates, from Qwest and the CLEC Community.

Qwest Corporation SCR040306-01 Add Product Specific Reject Codes SCR053106-01 IMA Change to Allow CLEC to Use Q or Z in the NSTN Field

AT&T SCR031203-02 Resolve Disconnect of Account Number SCR040306-01 Add Product Specific Reject Codes

Covad Lynn Hankins-Covad stated that she would provide Covad’s top 2 candidates via email.

Eschelon SCR050305-01 Bulk PIC Change Process in IMA SCR062906-02 Ability to Convert FBDL Listing with Changes (FBDL ACT = V)

Integra Laurie Fredricksen-Integra stated that she would provide Integra’s top 2 candidates via email. McLeodUSA McLeod stated that they would provide their top 2 candidates via email. 8/23/06 email received with McLeod’ USA’s Top 2 picks: SCR031103-01 Changes to Edits or Process Regarding Complex Listings on an ACT of N Order for Resale SCR081203-01 Resale Page Conditional

Sprint SCR031105-01 Change of Usage of CCNA for Sprint on LNP Orders SCR062906-02 Ability to Convert FBDL Listing with Changes (FBDL ACT = V)

Time Warner SCR062906-02 Ability to Convert FBDL Listing with Changes (FBDL ACT = V)

Verizon Business Verizon Business stated that they would provide their top 2 candidates via email. 8/22/06 email received with Verizon Business’ Top 2 picks: SCR053106-01 IMA Change To Allow CLEC To Use Q or Z In The NSTN Field SCR031203-02 Resolve Disconnect of Account Number

XO Communications XO stated that they were not ready for this exercise.

Peggy Esquibel Reed-Qwest asked that for those providing their top 2 picks via email, that the emails be sent to the cmpcr@qwest.com mailbox. Peggy then asked that the information be provided within the next 2 days. Peggy then stated that she would send the information provided, via email, to the call participants. NOTE: there were no emails received prior to the distribution of the ranking form. Peggy Esquibel Reed-Qwest stated that Qwest would distribute the Prioritization Form NLT 5 p.m. MT, Monday, August 21, 2006, via the Notification Process. The completed Prioritization Forms are to be submitted to the cmpcr@qwest.com mailbox, no more that 3 business days following Qwest’s distribution of the prioritization form. Peggy then noted that the highest point value, 19, should be assigned to the CR that you wish to be implemented first. A point value of 19 would indicate your #1 ranked candidate; a point value of 18 is your second choice, etc. The point value of 1 will indicate the candidate that you wish to be ranked last. Peggy then stated that Qwest would calculate the total point values received, and that the ranking results would be distributed to the CLECs within 2 business days following the submission of the ranking and no later than 5 p.m. MT on August 28, 2006. This is also via the Notification Process. Peggy then asked if there were any questions. There were none brought forward.

-- May 17, 2006 Systems CMP Meeting Discussion: Jill Martain-Qwest stated that the LOE for this CR is 105 to 176 hours and noted that it is a candidate for 21.0 prioritization. This Action Item is Closed.

-- April 25, 2006 Email Received From Eschelon: Thanks much, Peggy. Have great afternoon. Kim Isaacs Eschelon Telecom, Inc.

-- April 25, 2006 Email Sent to Eschelon: Kim, I checked with the Qwest SME and Qwest will continue to provide the detail as defined in the PCAT when SCR040306-01 is implemented. Peggy Esquibel-Reed Qwest Wholesale CMP

-- April 25, 2006 Email Received From Eschelon: Hello, Eschelon would like to confirm one point on SCR040306-01. When Qwest and the CLEC community worked through the Port In/Stop Force Port process, Qwest committed to providing additional detail the new service provider would need if they chose to escalate the issue with the old service provider. The Port In PCAT lists the following information Qwest will provide on the reject: Qwest will provide the following information on the rejected LSR: The PON/LSR number we used when submitting the port request to the OLSP The date when the request was submitted to the OLSP The method in which the request was submitted (i.e. email, online, fax) List of follow up dates and name(s) of the person(s) we attempted to contacted at the OLSP If the LSR was rejected due to wrong end user information provided to Qwest, Qwest will indicate that the LSR data does not match OLSP CSR data.

Eschelon would like to confirm that Qwest will continue to provide this information on LSRs rejected with the automated reject codes: No FOC received from current provider. Cannot Process Port In request. Rejected by current provider. Cannot process Port In request. Thank you. Kim Isaacs Eschelon Telecom, Inc.

-- April 19, 2006 Systems CMP Meeting Discussion: Denise Martinez-Qwest presented the CR and stated that the request is to add new reasons to the existing list. Denise stated that this would eliminate the need for an explanation in Remarks. Kim Isaacs-Eschelon asked if these were for Center rejects. Denise Martinez-Qwest said yes and will be manual, by the Center. Jeff Sonnier-Sprint stated that the CR specifies IMA and Fax Gateway. Jeff then asked if this request was also for IMA EDI. Denise Martinez-Qwest said yes. Jeff Sonnier-Sprint asked if this was already documented. Jill Martain-Qwest stated that the documentation would occur when the CR made a Release. There were no other questions or comments. This CR moves to Presented Status.

- April 12, 2006 Received Revised Change Request From CR Originator

-- April 11, 2006 Clarification: Included: Peggy Esquibel-Reed, Denise Martinez Review Request: An additional reject condition needs to be added. Denise will send to Peggy for revision of this Change Request. Impacted systems: IMA Common and Fax Gateway Impacted Products: All Action Plan: CR to be presented at the April 19, 2006 Monthly Systems CMP Meeting.

CenturyLink Response

April 28, 2006

RE: SCR040306-01 Add Product Specific Reject Codes

Qwest has reviewed the information submitted as part of Change Request SCR040306-01. Based upon research that has been conducted following the April 11, 2006 Clarification, Qwest is able to provide an estimated Level of Effort (LOE) of 105 to 176 hours for this IMA and Fax Gateway Change Request.

At the next Monthly Systems CMP Meeting, CMP participants will be given the opportunity to comment on this Change Request and provide additional clarifications. Any clarifications and/or modifications identified at that time will be incorporated into Qwest's further evaluation of this Change Request.

This Change Request is an eligible candidate for the IMA 21.0 prioritization vote.

Sincerely, Qwest Corporation