Wholesale: Products & Services

Archived System CR SCR040403-03 Detail

Currently QWEST requires CLECs to provide the expedite reasons (http://www.qwest.com/wholesale/clecs/exescover.html) in the Remarks field.

Expected Deliverables/Proposed Implementation Date (if applicable): AT&T requests Qwest support a new Expedite Reason field on the LSR.

Status History

Project Meetings

- August 2, 2007 Email Sent to AT&T: Thanks Kathy. I will place the CR in Pending Withdrawal status and the formal withdrawal will occur in the August CMP Meeting. Thanks again for your prompt reply! Peggy Esquibel-Reed Qwest Wholesale CMP

-- August 1, 2007 Email Received From AT&T: Hi Peggy, I checked with the originator, and this can be withdrawn. Thanks for your patience with this one!! Kathy

August 1, 2007 Email Sent to AT&T: Good Afternoon Kathy, This email is in regard to a CMP CR that AT&T submitted, to Qwest, in April 2003. I have attached a copy of the CR. In the 4+ years since this CR was submitted, there have been some changes. TRO/TRRO being one of those changes. The CR was submitted for UNE-P POTS and effective March 18, 2005, UNE-P POTS is only available through a Commercial Agreement and is no longer a product that can utilize the CMP Process. Based on this information, will AT&T agree to withdraw SCR040403-03? Thank you, in advance, for your prompt reply. Peggy Esquibel-Reed Qwest Wholesale CMP

- April 18, 2007 Systems CMP Meeting Discussion: Mark Coyne-Qwest stated that this attachment contained the Initial Prioritization List for the IMA 22.0 Release. Mark asked if there were any questions on the list. There were none. Mark then mentioned that Packaging would occur in the June timeframe and be communicated in CMP.

- February 15, 2006 Systems CMP Meeting Discussion for IMA 20.0 Prioritization CR Review: Jill Martain-Qwest stated that the list of IMA 20.0 candidates is located in Attachment M. She said instead of reviewing all candidates each CLEC will indicate what their top 2 candidates are. Jill said that we will also review the prioritization and ranking instructions following this exercise. Lynn Stecklein-Qwest said that we will ask each CLEC what there top 2 candidates are based on the attendance list. Below are the top two candidates per CLEC in attendance: AT&T-Sharon Van Meter #1 SCR031203-02 Resolve Disconnect of Account Number #2 SCR040403-03 Support of Expedite Reason Field on the LSR Covad (via email) #1 SCR102102-1X Dual Inventory of DSL Tie Cables in TIRKs and SWITHCH/FOMS #2 SCR103103-01 Support of Parsed and Structured CSR #2 Eschelon-Kim Isaacs #1 SCR 050305-01 Bulk PIC Change Process in IMA #2 SCR032202-1 IMA GUI-PostOrder/Status Updates/Posted to be Billed Integra Laurie Fredricksen stated that she would have to get back to Qwest on there top 2 candidates. McleodUSA (via email) #1 SCR031103-01 Changes to Edits or Process Regarding Complex Listings on an ACT of N Order for Resale #2 SCR040403-03 Support of Expedite Reason Field on the LSR SBC Bob Eggert said he is the ASR representative and that he will refrain from the IMA 20.0 prioritization process. Time Warner-Dianne Friend #1 SCR010705-01 Directory Listing Changes in Conjunction with LNP #2 SCR042704-01 FBDL PON Field VCI No representative from VCI was present. Verizon Business-Rosalin Davis #1 SCR040403-03 Support of Expedite Reason Field on the LSR #2 Rosalin stated that she would get back to Qwest on her second candidate. Information received via e-mail: #1 SCR042704-01 FBDL PON Field #2 SCR040403-03 Support of Expedite Reason on the LSR XO No representative from XO was present. Sprint-Jeff Sonnier #1 SCR010705-01 Directory Listing Changes in Conjunction with LNP #2 SCR031105-01 Change of Usage of CCNA for Sprint on LNP Orders TDS (via email) Julie Pickar stated that she would have to get back to Qwest on there top 2 candidates. E-mail received 2/15/06 on the TDS top 2 candidates #1 SCR032202-1 IMA GUI-PostOrder/Status Updates/Posted to be Billed #2 SCR 050305-01 Bulk PIC Change Process in IMA Cox-Tom Larson #1 SCR010705-01 Directory Listing Changes in Conjunction with LNP No second pick. Qwest-Jill Martain #1 SCR021904-02 Suppression of Jeopardy Status Updates #2 SCR102505-02 Edits for the LSR Delivery Address Activity (DACT) Field Comcast (via email) #1 SCR102505-02 Edits for the LSR Delivery Address Activity (DACT) Field #2 SCR110702-01 Request to Add Ability for CLECs to Get a List of Circuit IDs or Telephone #s Associated with Active POTS-Splitter

Jill Martain-Qwest stated that we will include everyone’s top 2 candidates in the meeting minutes. Lynn Stecklein-Qwest reviewed the prioritization instructions. She said that Qwest will distribute the Prioritization Form by 5 p.m. MT on February 20, 2006. She said that the completed Prioritization Form should be submitted to cmpcr@qwest.com no more that 3 business days following Qwest’s distribution of the prioritization form. Lynn said that the total point will be calculated by the Qwest CMP Manager and the results will be distributed to the CLECs within 2 business days following the submission of the ranking and no later than 5 p.m. on February 27, 2006. Sharon Van Meter-AT&T asked if Qwest could explain how the highest point value works and how, for example, number 21 would be the top choice. Lynn Stecklein-Qwest said that the highest point value (i.e. 21) should be assigned to the CR that Qwest and CLECs wish to be implemented first. She said that the next highest point value (i.e. 20) should be assigned to the CR that Qwest and the CLECs wish to be implemented second and so on. Bonnie Johnson-Eschelon explained that we go through this exercise to take into consideration what the other CLECs top priorities are so that as each CLEC votes they could take into consideration the other CLECs top 2 as well instead of just ranking their top 2 and then going down the list. Jeff Sonnier-Sprint asked if the ballot would have a ‘Point Value’ Column. Jill Martain-Qwest said that the ballot would have the ‘Point Value’ Column and that instructions would be included with the notification. Bonnie Johnson-Eschelon asked what the IMA 20.0 capacity was, hinting at 75,000 hours Jill Martain-Qwest said that the IMA 20.0 capacity is 7,500 hours.

February 16, 2005 Systems CMP Meeting Discussion: Sharon Van Meter-AT&T stated that this CR is a low priority for AT&T Liz Balvin-Covad stated that we need to look at QPP going forward. Chris Terrell-AT&T said that she agreed.

July 22, 2004 Systems CMP Meeting Discussion: Jill Martain/Qwest stated that Qwest would distribute the ballot on July 27th, it is due back to Qwest on July 30th, and Qwest would email the initial prioritization list to the CLECs on August 3rd. There were no questions. Donna Osborne-Miller/AT&T stated that this was a low priority for AT&T. Liz Balvin/MCI stated that this is a medium to high for MCI.

-- February 19, 2004 Systems CMP Meeting Discussion Excerpt (Attachments H & J): Judy Schultz/Qwest stated that she wanted to provide an update to the funding approval process that was discussed in the January CMP Systems Meeting. Judy referred everyone to Attachment J in the Distribution Package. She stated that all CRs are being re-evaluated and must be approved. Judy said that CRs could not be scheduled without approval. Judy stated that the CRs with an impact to the IMA interface would follow the existing prioritization process. Judy noted that the funding for IMA 15.0 and IMA 16.0 has been approved, as well as funding to begin work on IMA 17.0.

- January Systems CMP Meeting Discussion: Donna Osborne-Miller/AT&T stated that this is a low priority for AT&T.

-- August 21, 2003 Systems CMP Meeting Discussion: Phyllis Burt/AT&T stated that their interest was moderate. Stephanie Prull/McLeod stated that their interest was moderate.

- CMP Monthly Meeting- excerpt from Meeting Minutes May 22, 2003

SCR040403-03 Support of Expedite Reason field on the LSR (originated by AT&T) Donna Osborne-Miller/AT&T presented the CR. She asked if there were any questions. No questions were asked.

- Clarification Meeting March 10, 2003

Attendees: Phyllis Burt-AT&T, Donna Osborne-Miller-AT&T, Berkley Loggie-Qwest, Ann Robberson-Qwest, Shonna Pasionek-Qwest, Phyllis Suninss-Qwest, Terri Kilker-Qwest, Wendy Green-Qwest, John Gallegos-Qwest, Joleen Wees-Qwest, Lee Gomez-Qwest, Lynn Stecklein-Qwest, Peggy Esquibel-Reed-Qwest, Laurel Nolan- CRPM Qwest

Review of Request: Nolan-Qwest reviewed the CR description and asked if there were any additions or changes from AT&T. She read out the list of Expedite reasons from the PCAT. Burt-AT&T stated that the Medical was not current listed and that AT&T wanted all the reasons (including medial) to be added. Simons-Qwest stated that the OBF Document listed numbers related to each reason. Burt-AT&T stated that listing out the numbers and reasons would be fine. She asked what version Simons-Qwest was reading from. Simons-Qwest stated that the version was dated October 18, 2002 and that she did not see a version number. She said that the effective date was in September 2003.

Review of Products Pashonic-Qwest asked if the product was for UNE-P only. Burt-AT&T stated that she was requesting UNE-P POTS. She stated that it might be better to expand to all products. Osborne-Miller-AT&T explained that during the CMP Monthly Meeting the CR would be discussed and that other CLECs would give their input on the product set selected.

Review of Interface Pashonic-Qwest stated that the CR was currently listed as IMA EDI. She asked if it should be IMA Common. Osborne-Miller-AT&T stated that she wanted Qwest to look at the CR and determine if it should be IMA EDI or IMA Common.

Nolan-Qwest asked if there were any other questions or concerns. No further questions were asked. She stated that the CR would be presented by AT&T during the May CMP Monthly Meeting and that Qwest would provide a response within the required timeframe.

Meeting on CR adjourned. (Call continued on other AT&T CRs.)

CenturyLink Response

Qwest has reviewed the information submitted as part of AT&T Change Request SCR040403-03. Based upon research that has been conducted following the Clarification meetings (held May 10, 2003), Qwest is able to provide an LOE of 1675-2775 for this change. There are no SATE impacts.

At theMay Systems CMP Meeting, CMP participants will be given the opportunity to comment on this Change Request and provide additional clarifications. Qwest is interested in the experiences of the CMP community as relates to this issue. Qwest will incorporate any feedback received into further evaluation of this Change Request.

Sincerely, Qwest