Wholesale: Products & Services

Archived System CR SCR061703-01 Detail

Added Requirement to add information to DLIS for ACT=W. This CR now includes the addition of the CCNA to 4 of the DLIS Listing Display Screen(s): Listing Detail, AN Display Search Response, Listing History Display and the Account History Display Screen.

Original Description:

Create new fields (OCC=Old Company Code and OCCNA=Old Customer Carrier Name Abbreviation) on the LSR and DL forms to identify Old Service Provider to allow for flow through for Directory Listings. Currently, every Migration/Conversion order (CLEC to CLEC) falls out for manual handling. NOTE: These new fields are currently in OBF Issue #2537 and targeted for LSOG9.

Expected Deliverable:

Successful flow through for Directory Listings (Reseller/Unbundled Network CLEC to Reseller/Unbundled Network CLEC or FBDL and FBDL to FBDL)

Status History

Project Meetings

May 17, 2006 Systems CMP Meeting Discussion: Jill Martain-Qwest stated that the DLIS component is being deployed on May 18th and noted that the IMA portion was deployed in the 19.0 Release. Jill stated that the DLIS portion was discussed in the last CMP Meeting and stated that with the DLIS deployment, this effort would be complete. This CR will move to CLEC Test on May 18th.

- April 19, 2006 Systems CMP Meeting Discussion: Jill Martain-Qwest stated that this was just deployed in the IMA 19.0 Release and would remain in CLEC Test.

-- March 15, 2006 Systems CMP Meeting Discussion: Lee Gomez-Qwest stated that an additional requirement is needed to add information to DLIS for ACT=W. Lee stated that this CR would now include the addition of the CCNA to 4 of the DLIS Listing Display Screen(s) Listing Detail, AN Display Search Response, Listing History Display and the Account History Display Screen. Kim Isaacs-Eschelon asked if this effort would be ready for the IMA April 10th release. Lee Gomez-Qwest stated that this additional DLIS requirement would deploy with a May 18th DLIS Release. Lee then noted that the DLIS Release is being added to the OSS Releaser Calendar. Kim Isaacs-Eschelon asked if they are to use LSTR from April 10th to May 18th. Lee Gomez-Qwest stated yes. Jeff Sonnier-Sprint asked if the new fields needed information for new service. Lee Gomez-Qwest stated that the addition is only for FBDL only, ACT=W and that it would be required on the LSR. Jeff Sonnier-Sprint asked if this applies if transmitted via EDI. Lee Gomez-Qwest asked when Sprint would be migrating to the IMA 19.0 Release. Jeff Sonnier-Sprint stated that they would migrate to 19.0 in June. Lee Gomez-Qwest then noted that the new fields would be available, for Sprint, when they migrate to 19.0 in June. Kim Isaacs-Eschelon asked to confirm that ACT=W is for FBDL CLEC to CLEC and that ACT = W is not necessary with Qwest to CLEC. Lee Gomez-Qwest stated that was correct. Jeff Sonnier-Sprint stated that if ACT=W FBDL CLEC to CLEC, he is assuming that the LSR is going to Qwest in order to provide facilities to the new CLEC. Lee Gomez-Qwest stated this would be for the FBDL Listing and not for facilities. Lee then noted that ACT=W is for migrating of Listings for FBDL (Product 14). Jill Martain-Qwest then stated that the DLIS Release would be added to the OSS Calendar and posted to the web site. This Action item is closed. Jill Martain-Qwest stated that this CR will be deployed on April 10, 2006, in the IMA 19.0 Release.

February 8, 2006 Combined Overview and IMA EDI Disclosure Documentation Walkthrough for IMA EDI Release 19.0 (facilitated by Qwest IT) Attendees List (may be incomplete): Kyle Kirves-Qwest, Anders Ingemarson-Qwest, Angela Stewart-Qwest, Annelyn Aficial-AMS, Carol McKenzie-Qwest, Chris Terrell-AT&T, Chuck Anderson-Qwest, Curt Anderson-Qwest, Dawn Beck-Qwest, Denise Martinez-Qwest, Diane Burt-AT&T, Dianne Friend-Time Warner, Ellen McArthur-Qwest, Gary Berroa-Qwest, Jeff Yeager-Accenture, Judy DeRosier-Qwest, Lee Gomez-Qwest, Linda Birchem-Comcast, Lynn Stecklein-Qwest, Maria Aquino-AT&T, Mark Haynes-Qwest, Michael Lopez-Qwest, Nancy Thompson-Wisor, Orbit.com Representatives, Peggy Esquibel-Reed-Qwest, Roslyn Davis-Verizon Business, Shonna Pasionek-Qwest, Stephanie Prull-Eschelon Walkthrough Discussion: Introductions Kyle Kirves began the meeting by taking attendance and announcing the meeting purpose. The meeting notice included copies of the agenda, the candidate overview document, and a summary sheet of changes that customers can expect to see in the final version of the tech specs that do not appear in the draft. Kyle explained that the walkthrough would cover the candidates, the candidate impacts to the associated documentation, and the IMA EDI Disclosure Documentation overview. Kyle introduced Ellen McArthur to go over the first candidate, SCR051304-01- Request for Line Loss Notification to notify CLECs if the customer was lost to a Wireless. CANDIDATE REVIEWS: SCR061703-01 Create New Fields of OCC and OCCNA to Identify Old Service Provider Lee Gomez reviewed the information provided in the candidate overview document circulated with the meeting agenda and the meeting notification announcement. Kyle opened the floor to Questions. Stephanie Prull asked if the customer will only be required to use a single company code. Lee Gomez replied that, today, the state-specific OCN is required for EDI CLECs and back-end processing converts the code to the Company Code. With 19.0, there will only be one CC regardless of state for all IMA users. Stephanie asked if the Company Code does not pertain to OCC. Lee confirmed that the OCC and OCCNA are for FBDL only and required with ACT=W. FBDL does not support ACT=V, therefore it is not required. Lee also confirmed that this enhancement is for FBDL only. Stephanie asked what happens if the code is not sent? The result is an error message stating that the field is required for FBDL ACT=W. Stephanie asked what the customer should do if the Listings Reconciliation Query is down. Lee stated that the customer should use DLIS. Lee also remarked that CCNA is not on DLIS. If LSTR were down, the customer wouldn’t be able to submit the order. Chuck Anderson suggested that the customer could submit a bogus ACNA, but that the customer would likely be better served by waiting to send the order. Might as well not send it. Lee suggested that the CLEC could always contact the LOC to request the OCCNA info prior to submitting an order. Stephanie asked if the code is a letter for letter match. Lee stated that the code is a letter-for-letter match in LSTR, and that OCCNA is a three digit alpha code. Abbreviated? It is not an abbreviated version of the company name, but is actually the current ACNA being used by the FBDL CLECs. Kyle asked about GUI documentation updates. Mark Haynes covered the changes to the FBDL documentation. IMA EDI Disclosure Documentation Review Kyle conducted the review of the IMA EDI Disclosure Documentation. Kyle reviewed the agenda and advised as to the content of the agenda. Kyle reviewed the five change requests that are outstanding to date that CLECs can expect to see in the final disclosure. These changes appear as a separate attachment with the meeting materials. Kyle advised that there were no questions submitted through the CMP channels to date, but that those channels remain open through February 14, 2006. Kyle opened up the floor to questions on the changes for the Product/Transaction chapters (i.e., Appendix F). There were no questions. The majority of the questions asked involved the method Qwest uses to show changes in the new format and that change and replace cause the customer to stare and compare to identify the change. Chuck Anderson and Kyle Kirves agreed to review the process.

- January 18, 2006 Systems CMP Meeting Discussion: Connie Winston-Qwest stated that this Action Item was opened because we thought that this may impact previous releases. Connie stated that they found a solution and it will not impact previous releases. Jill Martain-Qwest stated that the IMA and SATE 19.0 Commitment are in Attachment M and there are no changes from Packaging.

November 16, 2005 Systems CMP Meeting Discussion: Jill Martain/Qwest stated that Attachment M lists the IMA and SATE candidates.

- July 20, 2005 Systems CMP Meeting Discussion for IMA 19.0 Prioritization CR Review: Jill Martain - Qwest stated that we provided a list of all candidates for IMA 19.0 in the June Meeting. Jill said that for this month’s prioritization, instead of reviewing all candidates, we would like to trial reviewing the top two candidates per CLEC. Liz Balvin-Covad asked why the Covad CR was not on this list. She said that she submitted it before the June 1st cutoff. Lynn Stecklein-Qwest said that the CR was a Product/Process CR not a System CR.

Below are the top two candidates per CLEC: Qwest #1 SCR061703-01 Create new fields of OCC and OCCNA on the LSR and DL Forms to identify old Service Prov #2 SCR052303-02 Request to Implement Interactive Agent Issue 3

AT&T #1 SCR051304-01 Request for Line Loss Notification to Notify CLECs if the Cust was lost to a Wireless Carrier #2 CR040204-01 PreOrder and Order Error Message When NPA NXX Does not Belong to Qwest

Liz Balvin-Covad asked if the Interactive Agent Issue 3 should be an Industry Change. Liz said that Qwest is not supporting Issue 2 anymore. Liz said that she was asking because the software won’t work going forward. Steph Prull-Eschelon said that if the Interactive Agent goes bad they would be in trouble as the vendor does not have to support it and EDI would be down until the new version was installed Jill Martain-Qwest stated that we currently don’t have it as an Industry Change and noted that the Industry Change CRs would still need to be voted upon and prioritized.

Covad #1 SCR102102-1X Dual Inventory of DSL Tie Cables in Tirks and Switch/FOMS #2 SCR052303-02 Request to Implement Interactive Agent Issue 3

Eschelon #1 Bulk PIC Change in IMA #2 SCR030405-01 Change to Reject RT Codes

Integra-Laurie Frederickson stated that she was not prepared for this exercise.

MCI #1 SCR103102-02 Eliminate PON Tracking Requirement for Reserved Title #2 SCR040204-01 PreOrder and Order Error Message When NPA Does not Belong to Qwest Communications

VCI #1 SCR040204-01 PreOrder and Order Error Message When NPA Does not Belong to Qwest Communication #2 SCR050305-01 Bulk PIC Change Process in IMA

Dianne Friend-Time Warner asked if all CLECs would be included in SCR031105-01 (Change of Usage of CCNA for Sprint on LNP Orders) Jill Martain-Qwest said yes.

Time Warner #1 SCR031105-01 Change of Usage of CCNA for Sprint on LNP Orders #2 SCR042704-01 FBDL PON Field

Sprint #1 #1 SCR031105-01 Change of Usage of CCNA for Sprint on LNP Orders #2 SCR10705-01 Directory Listing Changes in Conjunction with LNP.

Liz Balvin-Covad asked if Qwest new what the capacity for IMA 19.0 would be. Jill Martain-Qwest said that she did not know at this time. Liz Balvin-Covad asked if Qwest could provide a guesstimate. Jill Martain-Qwest said that her guess would be between 10,000 to 15, 000 hours but would not know until the end of the year.

-- February 16, 2005 Systems CMP Meeting Discussion: Jill Martain-Qwest stated that this CR is a high priority for Qwest.

-- July 22, 2004 Systems CMP Meeting Discussion: Jill Martain/Qwest stated that Qwest would distribute the ballot on July 27th, it is due back to Qwest on July 30th, and Qwest would email the initial prioritization list to the CLECs on August 3rd. There were no questions. Lee Gomez/Qwest explained the CR and stated that this is a medium low for Qwest.

- February 19, 2004 Systems CMP Meeting Discussion Excerpt (Attachments H & J): Judy Schultz/Qwest stated that she wanted to provide an update to the funding approval process that was discussed in the January CMP Systems Meeting. Judy referred everyone to Attachment J in the Distribution Package. She stated that all CRs are being re-evaluated and must be approved. Judy said that CRs could not be scheduled without approval. Judy stated that the CRs with an impact to the IMA interface would follow the existing prioritization process. Judy noted that the funding for IMA 15.0 and IMA 16.0 has been approved, as well as funding to begin work on IMA 17.0.

January Systems CMP Meeting Discussion: Connie Winston/Qwest stated that this CR is a low priority for Qwest.

-- September 18, 2003 Systems CMP Meeting Discussion: Lee Gomez/Qwest stated that this has been approved for LSOG 9 and noted that the CR was opened for FBDL customers. Lee stated that this CR is to do the transition of migrating listings. Lee stated that the CLEC would need to match criteria, you would tell Qwest that you are migrating the listing to yourself. Lee noted that this would result in a change to the customer code. Bonnie Johnson/Eschelon asked Kim Isaacs (Eschelon) to confirm that the problem was not on FBDL to FBDL, is on the Qwest CSR and having to verify information that is on the CSR. Lee Gomez/Qwest stated that this does not apply to QCSR and asked what kind of orders Eschelon was referring to. Bonnie Johnson/Eschelon stated that Eschelon gets an influx of rejects because of things on the Qwest CSR that was not being recapped. Kim Isaacs/Eschelon stated on UNE-P or UNE-E, for the do not call list, for example. Bonnie stated that they were previously not required to recap but now they are required to use all information because it is on the CSR. Bonnie Johnson/Eschelon stated that they are removing it and they are being required to recap it. Liz Balvin/MCI stated that is a 14.0 CR. Bonnie Johnson/Eschelon stated that they are not carrying it over on conversion, they are removing it. Stephanie Prull/McLeod stated that this started in January. Kim Isaacs/Eschelon stated that she talked with her Service Manager and was advised that this was due to the Qwest Quality Initiative; for Qwest to require the information. Bonnie Johnson/Eschelon stated that they now need to recap information for a listing that is going away. Bonnie stated that she does not know how pursue this, as it is not really CMP related. Bonnie stated that it could be a Product/Process issue. Kim Isaacs/Eschelon stated that she had a call with Mark Early (Qwest) and he advised her that it is due to the Quality Initiative that the information is needed on out activity. Kim stated that Mark (Early) is still checking into this. Connie Winston/Qwest stated that Qwest would take an Action Item to get status from Mark Early (Qwest). Connie stated that this sounds like more of an IMA issue, not listings. Lee Gomez/Qwest asked Eschelon for the error code that they are encountering. Bonnie Johnson/Eschelon stated that they get a hard reject and is going to the Center. Kim Isaacs/Eschelon stated that it is ‘need OAD on out listing’. Liz Balvin/MCI asked if this LSOG 9 candidate applies to Carrier to Carrier. Lee Gomez/Qwest stated that it is for CLEC to CLEC. Bonnie Johnson/Eschelon asked to confirm that is for when a listing does not appear on the Qwest CSR. Lee Gomez/Qwest responded correct. There were no additional comments or questions. This Action Item is closed.

-- August 21, 2003 Systems CMP Meeting Discussion: Connie Winston/Qwest stated that this is an LSOG 9 issue and noted that Lee Gomez (Qwest) can speak to this more in the September CMP Meeting. Bonnie Johnson/Eschelon asked if these would be required and asked why this information is necessary. Connie Winston/Qwest stated that today Lee is at OBF and she will have more information after this week’s forum to report on in September’s CMP Meeting. Connie Winston/Qwest stated that this was low importance to Qwest (in regard to the 15.0 prioritization) There were no additional comments or questions.

- July 17, 2003 Systems CMP Meeting Discussion: Connie Winston/Qwest reviewed the CR description and stated that this is very specific to FBDL. Connie stated that these are LSOG fields but that Qwest would like to implement them before LSOG. Alan Flanigan/Time Warner asked if these fields are required. Connie Winston/Qwest stated that they may be optional, will not know until it is defined. Connie stated that this might help in listings posting quicker. Connie stated that this might also help flowthrough. Bonnie Johnson/Eschelon asked if it would be better to bump up against DLIS. Connie Winston/Qwest stated that DLIS is the system that needs it and noted that this change request was originated by the DLIS process person, Lee Gomez. Connie stated that she would check with Lee to see if there are other options and stated that she would get Lee to attend the August Systems CMP Meeting to further explain. Donna Osborne-Miller/AT&T stated that it would be appreciated if Lee could explain further at August CMP. There were no other questions or comments. This CR is Pending Prioritization.

-- June 20, 2003 Clarification: CR Description: Create new fields (OCC=Old Company Code and OCCNA=Old Customer Carrier Name Abbreviation) on the LSR and DL forms to identify Old Service Provider to allow for flow through for Directory Listings. Currently, every Migration/Conversion order (CLEC to CLEC) falls out for manual handling. NOTE: These new fields are currently in OBF Issue #2537 and targeted for LSOG9. Impacted Interfaces: IMA Common, DirB, SATE Impacted Products: Directory Listings Expectation: Successful flow through for Directory Listings (Reseller/Unbundled Network CLEC to Reseller/Unbundled Network CLEC or FBDL and FBDL to FBDL) Action Plan: CR will be presented at the July Systems CMP Meeting.

CenturyLink Response

July 9, 2003

RE: SCR061703-01 Create new fields of OCC and OCCNA on the LSR and DL forms to identify Old Service Provider

Qwest has reviewed the information submitted as part of Change Request (SCR061703-01). Based upon the scope of this CR as agreed to in the Clarification Meeting (held June 20, 2003) Qwest is able to provide an estimated Level of Effort (LOE) of 2675 to 4425 hours for this IMA Change Request. SATE impacts are 35 to 40 hours.

At the next Monthly Systems CMP Meeting, CMP participants will be given the opportunity to comment on this Change Request and provide additional clarifications. Any clarifications and/or modifications identified at that time will be incorporated into Qwest's further evaluation of this Change Request.

This Change Request is an eligible candidate for the IMA 15.0 prioritization vote.

Sincerely, Qwest