Wholesale: Products & Services

Archived System CR SCR081204-01 Detail

Currently the LSR ID is provided on all IMA GUI responses except for the upfront BPL edits.

Expected Deliverables/Proposed Implementation Date (if applicable):

Eschelon expects that the LSR ID field all EDI responses will be consistent with the IMA GUI responses. Eschelon expects to see an LSR ID on all responses except for BPL Edit rejects. Eschelon also expects that this field will be denoted in a consistent format and naming convention on the responses.

Implementation would be with a future IMA release.

Status History

Project Meetings

Jill Martain/Qwest stated that this CR deployed on 10/17/05. Steph Prull/Eschelon said that this CR can be closed

10/19/05 Systems CMP Meeting

This CR deployed on 10/17/05 and will remain in CLEC Test.

Combined Overview and IMA EDI Disclosure Documentation Walkthrough for IMA EDI Release 18.0

August 10, 2005 8:00 am

Location: CONFERENCE BRIDGE ONLY Conference Bridge: 1-888-725-8686 Conference ID: 4317009

Attendees List* Anders Ingemarson - Qwest Angela Stewart - Qwest Angie Thompson - Weiser Anne Robberson - Qwest Brian Caywood - Qwest Chris Terrell - AT&T Chuck Anderson - Qwest Cim Chambers - Qwest Dave Schleicher - Qwest Denise Martinez - Qwest Diane Burt - AT&T Dianne Friend - Time Warner Gary Berroa - Qwest John Sanclaria - Qwest Judy DeRosier - Qwest Lynn Stecklein - Qwest Mark Coyne - Qwest Mark Haynes - Qwest Michael Lopez - Qwest Michelle Thacker - Qwest Pat Bratetic - Qwest Russ Urevig - Qwest Sandie Tekavec -Qwest Shon Higer - Qwest Stephanie Prull - Eschelon

*List may be incomplete. 1. Introductions Kyle Kirves began the meeting by taking attendance and announcing the meeting purpose. The meeting notice included copies of the agenda and the candidate overview document. Kyle explained that the walkthrough would cover the candidates, the candidate impacts to the associated documentation, and the IMA EDI Disclosure Documentation overview.

SCR081204-01- LSR ID on responses Denise Martinez reviewed the information provided in the candidate overview document circulated with the meeting agenda and the meeting notification announcement.

Kyle opened the floor to Questions. There were no questions.

Kyle asked about updates to the GUI documentation.

Dave Schleicher explained that the GUI documentation would show negligible changes (small wording changes).

Kyle asked if there were any other questions. No questions, so Kyle moved discussion to the next candidate.

2/16/05 CMP Systems Meeting - IMA 18.0 Candidate Summary

Bonnie Johnson-Eschelon said this CR is a high priority for Eschelon.

11/17/04 CMP Systems Meeting

Jill Martain/Qwest stated that the LOE for this request is 1200 to 1600 hours.

10/20/04 CMP Systems Meeting

Stephanie Prull/Eschelon stated that she has a question on this denial and has been working with Lynn (Stecklein/Qwest). Jill Martain/Qwest stated that some of the information on the denial is in error and as a result of the comments submitted by Eschelon that Qwest is accepting this CR. Jill stated that there is value in having consistency between EDI and the GUI. Stephanie Prull/Eschelon stated that was great and that it would help in solving notice problems that she is finding in the GUI. Liz Balvin/Covad asked if the effort is a synch-up for EDI & GUI, would a CR be necessary. Jill Martain/Qwest stated that a CR would be required because it is a change to the system. Jill noted that the LSRID is not in the same field in EDI on all notices and that the CR was asking for changes from that perspective as well, so yes, a CR is required. Liz Balvin/Covad stated okay.

9/16/04 CMP Systems Meeting

Jill Martain/Qwest stated that this CR was presented as a walk on in the August Meeting. There were no questions or comments.

8/23/04 Clarification Meeting

Attendees: Steph Prull - Eschelon, Kim Isaacs - Eschelon, Jen Arnold - TDS Metrocom/US Link, Emily Baird - Popp Telecom, Denise Martinez - Qwest, Michelle Thacker - Qwest, Conrad Evans - Qwest, Peggy Esquibel - Reed - Qwest, Lynn Stecklein - Qwest

Review Description of Change Request Eschelon is requesting that Qwest systems make the LSR ID of an order required on the following responses: Completions, LR where RT = Z and reject is from the ISC, Service Order Status Inquiry, and PSONs. Eschelon is also requesting that the naming convention for the LSR ID field be consistent among the transactions. Currently the LSR ID is either designated by LSR NO or ID on the EDI Responses.

Currently the LSR ID is provided on all IMA GUI responses except for the upfront BPL edits.

Discussion: Steph Prull - Eschelon stated that Eschelon would like to see EDI and GUI standard.

Denise Martinez - Qwest stated that she understood what Eschelon was requesting and had no questions.

Confirm Areas & Products Impacted Steph Prull - Eschelon stated that this impacted all products and IMA EDI.

Establish Action Plan Lynn Stecklein - Qwest stated that Eschelon will present this CR in the September 16, 2004 Systems CMP Meeting.

8/18/04 CMP Systems Meeting

Stephanie Prull/Eschelon stated that this CR is requesting that Qwest systems make the LSR ID of an order required on Eschelon is requesting that Qwest systems make the LSR ID of an order required on the following responses: Completions, LR where RT = Z and reject is from the ISC, Service Order Status Inquiry, and PSONs. Stephanie said that Eschelon is also requesting that the naming convention for the LSR ID field be consistent among the transactions. Stephanie stated that request would accommodate a previous Covad action item. Jill Martain/Qwest stated that the status of this CR will change to presented.

E-mail from Eschelon 8/12/04

Hi,

Attached please see the systems CR for Population of the LSR ID on EDI Responses. I would like to add this CR as a walk on item for the Wednesday Aug 18th systems meeting. This CR is related to action item: AI052004-03. Please note that Covad has indicated to Eschelon that this is a CR they have high interest in and would be willing to co sponsor. I will let John comment to the CR as he feels necessary.

Please let me know what times are available for Qwest to host the clarification call.

Thanks Steph

<>

Stephanie Prull EDI Business Analyst Eschelon Telecom, INC. Phone: 612-436-6058 Fax: 612-436-6158 Email: saprull@eschelon.com

CenturyLink Response

November 4, 2004

RE: SCR081204-01 LSR ID on Responses

Qwest has reviewed the information submitted as part of Change Request (SCR081204-01). Based upon the scope of this CR as agreed to in the Clarification Meeting (held August 23, 2004) Qwest is able to provide an estimated Level of Effort (LOE) of 1200 to 1600 hours for this IMA Change Request.

At the next Monthly Systems CMP Meeting, CMP participants will be given the opportunity to comment on this Change Request and provide additional clarifications. Any clarifications and/or modifications identified at that time will be incorporated into Qwest's further evaluation of this Change Request.

This Change Request is an eligible candidate for the IMA 18.0 prioritization vote.

Sincerely, Qwest

Qwest Response

October 12, 2004

Stephanie Prull Eschelon

CC: Connie Winston Randy Owen Jill Martain Peggy Esquibel-Reed

This letter is in response to CLEC Change Request number SCR081204-01, dated 08/12/04, titled: LSR ID on responses.

CR Description: Eschelon is requesting that Qwest systems make the LSR ID of an order required on the following responses: Completions, LR where RT = Z and reject is from the ISC, Service Order Status Inquiry, and PSONs. Eschelon is also requesting that the naming convention for the LSR ID field be consistent among the transactions. Currently, the LSR ID is either designated by LSR NO or ID on the EDI responses.

Expected Deliverables/Proposed Implementation Date (if applicable): Eschelon expects that the LSR ID field on all ECI responses will be consistent with the IMA GUI responses. Eschelon expects to see an LSR ID on all responses except for BPL Edit rejects. Eschelon also expects that this field will be denoted in a consistent format and naming convention on the responses.

History: A clarification meeting was held on Monday, August 23, 2004 with Eschelon and Qwest representation. At this meeting, Eschelon stated that this request impacts all products and IMA EDI.

Qwest Response: Qwest has completed an analysis for SCR081204-01, LSR ID on responses, and has determined that this change does not provide a reasonable demonstrable business benefit, due to the fact that although Qwest does not provide the LSR ID/NO on the notices defined by Eschelon, the CLEC PON is provided.

LSR IDs/NOs are currently not provided for the IMA GUI transactions of those notices (Completions, LR where RT = Z and reject is from the ISC, Service Order Status Inquiries, and PSONs) either. However, Qwest does provide the CLEC PON on these transactions for matching purposes. The LSR ID/NO is not entered on Qwest service orders, which are the source that provides the data necessary for most of those notifications identified by Eschelon

Qwest is denying your request for SCR081204-01, LSR ID on responses, due to no demonstrable business benefit.

Sincerely,

Qwest