Wholesale: Products & Services

Archived System CR SCR100201-1 Detail

 
Title: Provide ‘true’ flow through for UNE P Resale LSRs
CR Number Current Status
Date
Level of
Effort
Interface/
Release No.
Area
Impacted
Products
Impacted

SCR100201-1 Completed
4/22/2002
-   12/ UNE-P Resale
Originator: Stichter, Kathy
Originator Company Name: Eschelon
Owner: Winston, Connie
Director:
CR PM: Stecklein, Lynn
Description Of Change
Currently Qwest identifies UNE-P Resale products as eligible for flow through, however it has been Eschelon’s experience that the partial service order creation does not include service order detail (including but not limited to CFA, USOCs, etc.)

Eschelon continues to provide examples of service order errors that Qwest has made when service orders have not been issued by Qwest SDCs as requested on our LSRs. Qwest’s SDCs use the feature called Cutting and Pasting. CFA information is often incorrect on a service order because augments to our co-locations have different naming conventions. For resale and UNE-P, features including but not limited to CFN (Call Forwarding Number) and PIC (Primary Inter-exchange Carrier) are often omitted completely or essential information pertaining to these features is omitted leaving our end user customer without the functionality requested on our LSR. Since there is no ability to proactively identify Qwest service orders prior to DD (detail available on Service Order Completion only) the customer has been negatively impacted by the time the error is detected. Eschelon asks Qwest to provide TRUE flow through for LSRs submitted.

Status History

Date Action Description
10/2/2001 Info Sent to CLEC Sent updated CR to Kathy Stichter and Stephen Sheahan 
10/18/2001 Discussed at Monthly CMP Meeting CR discussed in CMP meeting - Eschelon did not feel a clarification meeting was necessary. L. Stecklein cancelled the clarification meeting scheduled on 10/22/01. 
10/25/2001 Status Changed Prioritization list sent to all CLECs for IMA 10.0 ranking, status changed to prioritization 
10/30/2001 Info Received From CLEC Sent e-mail to K Stichter to determine when the examples would be sent to Connie Winston on the Flow Through issue. 
10/31/2001 Release Ranking Ranking for Release 10.0 occurred at October, 2001 CMP Meeting. SCR100201-1 ranked 21 
11/5/2001 Info Received From CLEC Received spreadsheet from B Johnson at Eschelon with examples of flow through errors. Forwarded information to John Gallegos and team for investigation. 
11/8/2001 Record Update After research of flow through errors a clarification meeting will be scheduled with Eschelon to discuss findings. 
11/15/2001 Discussed at Monthly CMP Meeting Discussed in the Nov CMP meeting. The flow through errors are being researched by Mark Coyne's team to determine the type of errors. 
12/5/2001 Record Update The flow through errors examples sent by Eschelon are still being researched. 
1/17/2002 Discussed at Monthly CMP Meeting CR # SCR100201-1 discussed during 10.0 Packaging Presentation 
1/17/2002 Status Changed Status updated to 'In Definition' based upon 10.0 Packaging discussion from CMP meeting 
1/31/2002 Clarification Meeting Held A meeting was held to discuss spreadsheet of errors with Eschelon and to discuss the intent of this CR. 
2/4/2002 Info Requested from CLEC Meeting minutes sent to Eschelon and confirmation requested. 
2/5/2002 Info Received From CLEC Confirmation received from B Johnson re: content of meeting minutes 
2/7/2002 Record Update Qwest researching questions received from Eschelon re: flow through and will provide response; CR updated to reflect that this CR seeks to provide documentation not a system change; status updated to Evaluation 
3/19/2002 Qwest Response Issued Qwest response sent to Eschelon 
3/19/2002 CLEC Requested Info Bonnie forwarded question for investigation re: UNE-P - forwarded to Process for answer. 
3/25/2002 Info Sent to CLEC Response sent to B Johnson re: flow through 
4/2/2002 Info Requested from CLEC Contacted B Johnson to determine if Qwest has answered all questions associated with this CR. Bonnie said that she wanted to check a couple of things and would report at the next CMP meeting. 
4/8/2002 Status Changed Status changed to pending closure 
4/18/2002 Discussed at Monthly CMP Meeting SCR100201-1 discussed at April Systems CMP Monthly meeting; please see Systems CMP Distribution Package April CMP - Attachment E 
4/18/2002 Status Changed Status updated from 'CLEC Test' to 'Completed' per agreement at April Systems CMP Meeting 
4/18/2002 Status Changed Status changed to completed 

Project Meetings

4/18/02 CMP Systems Meeting Bonnie Johnson/Eschelon stated that this was completed.

10/18/01 CMP meeting. The definition of Flow Through = When the order goes through the Service Order Processor error free without human intervention. Eschelon and Allegiance brought up examples associated with the CFA and Circuit ID's that are missing or not the same as on the LSR that was submitted. C. Winston and T. Jacobs will take the lead on this issue. L. Powers will send examples to Qwest (T. Jacobs) of LSRs that are not true Flow Through. Qwest will research and determine what the problem is. L. Powers will also meet with Ken Olson to review a report that shows per CLEC why some orders do not Flow Through.

###

11/01/01 Per Kathy Sticher, examples of Flow Through are now being sent to Kathy Rein in the Mim Center. Susie Wells to contact B. Johnson to forward examples to L. Stecklein.

###

To: "Mark T Coyne" cc:"Connie D Winston" , Michael Buck/Mass/USWEST/US@USWEST

Subject:RE: SCR100201-1 Provide "True" Flow Through for UNE-P Resale LSRs

Mark, Here is the response from Bonnie Johnson re: confirmation of what we discussed on our call. Thanks!

- Forwarded by Lynn Stecklein/GROUPWARE/USWEST/US on 02/05/2002 08:27 AM To:Lynn Stecklein , klsticher@eschelon.com, "Johnson, Bonnie J." cc:krolson@qwest.com

Subject:RE: SCR100201-1 Provide "True" Flow Through for UNE-P Resale LSRs

Hi Lynn, You have captured this correctly to my recollection.

Thanks,

Bonnie

--Original Message-- From:Lynn Stecklein [SMTP:lsteckl@qwest.com] Sent:Monday, February 04, 2002 1:38 PM To:klsticher@eschelon.com; bjjohnson@eschelon.com Cc:krolson@qwest.com Subject:SCR100201-1 Provide "True" Flow Through for UNE-P Resale LSRs

Bonnie and Kathy, I want to thank you again for taking the time to clarify SCR100201 with Ken Olson and myself. We both feel that our discussion clarified the intent of this change request.

I am sending this e-mail to summarize the details of our call on February 2. I would appreciate confirmation that I have captured what we discussed accurately and also what we agreed upon going forward.

In November, Eschelon forwarded a spreadsheet of flow through errors for Qwest to research. These errors were supposed to be examples associated with SCR100201-1. Qwest completed this investigation and determined that these examples were not associated with this change request. Eschelon confirmed today that the spreadsheet was not meant to be associated withthis change request. These errors were associated with flow through issues on 1FB, CCMS services. There is a separate effort underway to address these errors.

In SCR100201-1, Eschelon clarified that they were looking for Qwest to provide the definition of "true flow" . In addition, Eschelon would also like Qwest to address the following:

What is the definition of flow through? When is the Manual Handling Indicator used? Is a partial service order created when the Manual Handling indicator is used? What causes the LSR to drop from FTS flow through? If it drops,what portion of the service order is created? Qwest will also provide an updated matrix of LSR's eligible for Flow Through that include exceptions.

Qwest agreed to provide a response to address these questions.Please let me know as soon as possible if we have captured our discussion accurately.

Thanks,

Lynn Stecklein Ken Olson

CenturyLink Response

3/19/02 Bonnie forwarded the following questions - Is UNE-P pots true flow through if the order is sent correctly. That means no SDC touches the order for any reason. You have it listed on the eligible chart. Send to Process for investigation.

o:bjjohnson@eschelon.com, klstichter@eschelon.com cc:krolson@qwest.com, Shon Higer/COMPLEX/USWEST/US@USWEST, Michael Buck/Mass/USWEST/US@USWEST

Subject: SCR100201-1 Flow Through Response

On January 31, 2002, Eschelon and Qwest held a conference call to discuss SCR100201-1. Eschelon clarified that the purpose of this change request was to further understand the order flow through process. Eschelon requested that Qwest provide additional information on the following items in order to bring this change request to closure.

What is the definition of flow through?

Any flow through eligible LSR that is processed mechanically, and service orders issued in the SOP without any manual intervention, can be considered as "true" flow through.

When is the Manual Handling Indicator used?

There are some complex scenarios within the boundaries of the flow through eligible matrix that must be manually handled. These more complex scenarios are generally identified by function or type of activity and are product specific. Service managers can answer questions about when it is appropriate to mark a LSR for manual handling.

Is a partial service order created when the Manual Handling indicator is used? What is created on the partial service order?

When manual handling is requested, no portion of a service order is created mechanically so it is important to limit the use of the manual indicator to those appropriate situations.

What causes the LSR to drop from FTS flow through? If it drops, what portion of the service order is created?

The service order error conditions may be caused by LSR input errors or Qwest processing issues associated with service order creation. Qwest automatically creates as much of the service order as possible for ALL products that are listed as exceptions on the attached exception table.

Qwest will also provide an updated matrix of LSR's eligible for Flow Through that include exceptions.

See Attached documents

Once you have had an opportunity to review the above information, let me know if you have any questions. I will schedule a follow up meeting if necessary.

Information Current as of 1/11/2021